Harms 1
Taylor Harms
Doctor David
Preston
Expository
Composition
1 June 2014
Entering
the Other Side
The beginning of senior year would
fill each student with excited, anticipation, and ambition for the year to
come, some students more than others, but it was universal. Coming into the
Expository Composition course I was under the impression that we would be doing
a lot of reading of articles or books, to be responded to later on. Singing up
for it the previous year, I just basically picked a class enei-minie-moe style,
but I couldn’t have chosen any better as I now have learned. I had no idea of
what was about to come. When Dr. Preston explained what the course would really
consist of, I was shocked. Never would I have imagined a course that actually
encouraged electronic usage in the classroom and the internet as a basic medium
for most of our work. He would remind us still that there may be substitutes
for mediums and the method of learning, but there is no substitute for raw hard
work and the most basic and efficient style of learning: when it comes natural.
When it is relateable and doesn’t feel like our previous connotation of the
word “learning”.
Coming into this year, I was
confident in my writing skills, I knew that I possessed somewhat of a talent
for writing as I had taken AP English and U.S. History the year before
Harms 2
which had
sharpened my skills. I was confident and even a little cocky, and this course
was a reality check. I now wasn’t writing for a teacher, but rather the world.
I was aware that everybody would have access to my assignments and responses so
I had to be sure that they were of top quality which was good training for the
adult world. The job and college markets are carnivorous so any step forward
needs to be the best representation of myself. It improved my thinking skills
because now I had to look at my work from the perspective of an audience, and
even competing with other students to have the top responses.
The end of the year masterpiece
presentations would be a culmination of what we had learned throughout the
year. Day in and day out our lectures would consist of the impact of social
networking and how we can use every element of the internet to our advantage.
Networking brings people together intellectually, romantically, and for me,
professionally. My exposure to the world wide web is what led me to finding an
interest in civil engineering and a spot on a trip to visit a prestigious college
to collaborate with real third year architecture students, it put me on the
level of people I would never expect. They looked to me for answers and it was
almost overwhelming. They showed me a side of education that was inspiring; and
it is the other side. The other side of what a classroom could be; not divided
by cliques or seating arrangements but by a common passion and subject. These
people made it to the other side and thrived, they survived the obsurdity of high
school social politics.
I realize that I haven’t really
defined Open Source Learning according to myself. Well I see it best defined
as: making education your own project. The product is you, make it the most
marketable by doing things well because you truly enjoy it, nobody can take
that away. Doing this alone is difficult many times by nature because finally
having the chance to make your own path can be scary, so having a classmate
next to you is comforting. They are in the same boat as you and that develops a
sense of trust. Everybody is there trying to reach their own value of success
and not everybody has the same talents. For instance a person wanting to make
clothing brands may not know the technical side of the market, so how could
they be successful? They can’t, that is why a person interested in business
would be a perfect match for them, making them both depend on each other to get
to the other side. The students of this course have earned the trust of
parents, peers, an officials that we can do things on our own. That this crazy
new method of learning can be successful and that the proof is in the
masterpiece. The students and teacher took the requirements, incorporated them
into a format that makes sense, and completed them with even more marketable
value that before.
The development of this trust
however couldn’t have been possible in just any environment. The environment of
our classroom was more like a coffee shop with the teacher as just another
person there. With his sarcasm, loose body language, and quickness to shut
Harms 3
down a
person out of line with witty observations and actually taking the time to know
the person, Dr. Preston seemed like one of the guys just messing around with
his friend. It made him more approachable, especially knowing that he knew
numerous people in just about any field, so he is one of our greatest sources.
I have reconnected with a passion
through this course. One of helping people, not in Gabi’s way of compassion,
but one concerning a quality of life. Changing the very place in which generations
of tomorrow would learn. Learning about it came natural when he introduced me
to professors and students and I saw that other people did care about this,
that I could use my excitement for something rather abstract and make it
concrete.
My time in this course I feel was
well spent. Sure I had some off days in which I just wouldn’t even try to care,
but that was because I was looking at it through the wrong lense. As explained,
I, and everybody else, suffered from the brainwashing of older styles of
education which is what made it difficult to switch, but once I did, I had seen
the light of it all; the other side.
No comments:
Post a Comment